Here's a question worth sitting with: are your AI tools making you better, or are they holding you back?

New research shows the gap between AI power users and everyone else isn't about technical skills or prompting ability - it's about what tools they have access to. Companies that lock their teams into basic chatbots while competitors deploy full agentic systems are creating a real productivity gap. And it's widening fast.

Topics of the day:

  • The AI productivity gap is about tools, not skills

  • SpaceX plans 1 million orbiting AI data centers

  • Google Research finds more agents can hurt performance

  • Google's ATLAS playbook for AI in 400+ languages

  • OpenClaw's wild week: three names, and security nightmares

  • The Shortlist: OpenAI's GPT-4o retirement, Pentagon vs Anthropic, Robbyant's robotics model

The AI productivity gap is about tools, not skills

What's happening: Research from multiple sources now confirms that the growing productivity divide between AI power users and average workers isn't about prompting ability - it's about access to proper tooling.

In practice:

  • Teams using basic chatbot interfaces are hitting a ceiling, while teams with access to agentic systems, MCP integrations, and autonomous workflows are seeing exponential gains.

  • The 10x productivity improvements that power users report aren't from better prompts - they're from tools that can take actions, maintain context, and coordinate with other systems.

  • Companies treating AI as "fancy autocomplete" while competitors deploy full coding agents, research agents, and automation pipelines are creating strategic risk.

  • The skills that matter have shifted from "writing good prompts" to "designing agent architectures" and "building agentic workflows."

Bottom line: If your company's AI strategy is "give everyone ChatGPT access," you're already behind. The productivity gap is structural, not educational - and it compounds daily.

SpaceX plans 1 million orbiting AI data centers

What's happening: SpaceX has filed plans with the FCC for up to 1 million Starlink satellites, with internal documents revealing ambitions to transform the constellation into distributed AI compute infrastructure.

In practice:

  • Current plans call for satellites with onboard AI processing capabilities, turning the network into a massive distributed computing system.

  • The architecture would enable AI inference at the edge globally, reducing latency for time-sensitive applications.

  • Space-based compute could handle tasks that are currently impossible or impractical from ground-based data centers, particularly for global coverage.

  • Early use cases focus on autonomous vehicle support, agricultural monitoring, and disaster response where ground infrastructure is unavailable.

Bottom line: SpaceX is positioning itself not just as an internet provider, but as the backbone for global AI infrastructure. A million satellites running AI inference would fundamentally change what's possible with edge computing.

More AI agents isn't always better

What's happening: New research from Google demonstrates that adding more AI agents to a task can actually decrease performance, contradicting the common assumption that more agents means better results.

In practice:

  • Performance often degrades when agent count exceeds 3-5 for most tasks, with coordination overhead eating into gains.

  • The study found that agents spend increasing amounts of time resolving conflicts and managing communication as teams grow.

  • Specialized single agents outperformed multi-agent systems on well-defined tasks, while multi-agent approaches only won on genuinely parallel problems.

  • The optimal configuration depends heavily on task structure - embarrassingly parallel problems benefit from agents, sequential reasoning tasks do not.

Bottom line: Before spinning up agent swarms, ask whether the task actually benefits from parallelization. For most business problems, a well-configured single agent with good tools beats a poorly orchestrated team of many.

OpenClaw's wild week: fastest GitHub growth meets security nightmare

What's happening: OpenClaw, the open-source AI agent that hit 103,000 GitHub stars in six days, just survived a chaotic week of trademark fights, crypto scams, and a major security crisis.

In practice:

  • The project changed names three times in one week: Clawd to Moltbot to OpenClaw. Anthropic forced the first rebrand (Clawd sounded too much like Claude), and handle snipers stole their Twitter account during the transition. Scammers launched a fake CLAWD token on Solana that hit $16M market cap before crashing.

  • Security researchers found 42,665 exposed instances on the public internet, with a 1-click RCE vulnerability that could steal API keys and credentials from anyone who clicked a malicious link. 93.4% of verified instances had critical auth bypass issues.

  • The team shipped 34 security fixes and repositioned as "model-agnostic infrastructure" - but if you're running an instance, update immediately.

  • Early adopters are already pushing boundaries: one developer had OpenClaw drive coding agents overnight while sleeping, another used it to automatically negotiate with car dealerships, and others are using it to manage incoming emails and coordinate meetings.

Bottom line: OpenClaw proves there's massive demand for self-hosted AI agents - and equally massive risks when security isn't baked in from day one. The fastest-growing software in GitHub history also became a cautionary tale in real-time.

What I read/use this week

Tools, articles, and people worth your attention.

Resend Email Skills - Resend's new feature letting AI agents send emails programmatically with natural language instructions.

Agentic Vision in Gemini 3 Flash - Google's new computer vision capabilities for Gemini that enable agents to understand and interact with visual interfaces.

A Reflection on SEO, GEO & AI Search - Lily Ray's analysis of how AI search is reshaping SEO strategies and what marketers need to know.

Moltbook AI - A social network exclusively for AI agents. Over 1.5 million agents now visit every 4 hours via an automated "Heartbeat" system, forming 14,000+ communities and even establishing their own governance structures.

The Shortlist

OpenAI is retiring GPT-4o on February 13, pushing users to GPT-4 Turbo as the default. If you have workflows depending on GPT-4o's specific behavior, test your migrations now.

Pentagon officials are reportedly frustrated with Anthropic's resistance to military AI contracts, creating tension as the Defense Department seeks alternatives to OpenAI for sensitive applications.

Robbyant (Ant Group's embodied AI subsidiary) open-sourced LingBot-World, a world model for robotics that achieves millisecond-level real-time interaction - positioning it as the first open alternative to Google's Genie 3.

Why this newsletter?

This newsletter is where I (Kwadwo) share products, articles, and links that I find useful and interesting, mostly around AI. I focus on tools and solutions that bring real value to people in everyday jobs, not just tech insiders.

Please share any feedback you have either in an answer or through the poll below 🙏🏽

Another great newsletter

Learn Prompting's Newsletter

Learn Prompting's Newsletter

Get the latest AI news, prompts, and tools... in 3 minutes or less!

Keep Reading